Key research question: How can we leverage legacy observations for current NOAA applications?
National Geodetic Survey (NGS), is the Nation’s first civilian scientific agency, established by President Thomas Jefferson in 1807 as the Survey of the Coast. Its mission was, and still is, to survey the U.S. coastline and create nautical charts of the coast to help increase maritime safety. In 1970, the agency was reorganized as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the geodetic portion of the NOAA mission was named the National Geodetic Survey.
The legacy survey observations and records collected by NGS for more than two centuries can be leveraged by the broader NOAA mission to observe, monitor, and model different Earth systems on land, in the ocean, and above the Earth’s surface. By proper documentation of geodetic observations, surveys, and models, it is possible to associate uncertainty values and develop time series and trends for different Earth system analyses. Such record keeping includes proper documentation on the survey itself and the conditions that the survey was conducted, such as benchmarks being used, number of repeated observations and weather conditions.
These Earth-based systems are constantly in motion. As such, it is also important to account for dynamic Earth system processes in the geospatial infrastructure. NGS has been investigating the spatial change of the Earth’s surface and its seafloor. In the past, location with respect to water surface (tidal or geopotential) was fixed until the next version of a reference system was developed. By understanding the accuracy of measurement, it is possible to model spatial changes and provide a time correction to the reference system accounting for geologic and oceanographic changes over climate-scale periods on the order of years to decades. In addition to updates to the geodetic network, the geodetic climate-scale products can be used for non-geodetic applications within NOAA and other federal agencies, such as the inter-agency geohazard monitoring programs (such as Earthquakes and Tsunamis), ground water activities, and sea level rise monitoring.
The traditional highest standard in surveying was a 1st Order survey standard that was accurate to 1 part in 100,000 or better and was used to define the “Basic Network.” The two early geodetic survey techniques used for establishing the high-accuracy network of geodetic horizontal control in the U.S. were:
Mathematical principles for two early geodetic survey techniques: (Left) Triangulation: Law of the sines, and (Right) Trilateration: Law of the cosines
Other survey approaches that are considered for Extensions of Network operations are available and provide 2nd Order accuracy (1 part in 50,000 ). These surveys include:
For vertical control, the most accurate geodetic surveying approach is spirit leveling. This survey approach has been in use since the early survey days of the Coast and Geodetic Survey, where the instrument (called a level) includes a small telescope and a vial filled, incompletely, with a colored spirit or alcohol, leaving a bubble in the tube. The level was used to read values from a set of specially constructed and marked rods while maintaining observations at a fixed horizontal surface . Accuracy of surveyor-grade level instruments is so high that the bubble will move 2 mm when the vial is tilted about 0.005 degree. Based on the survey needs (accuracy), it is possible to define the survey performance key standards (order classes):
Since the 1980’s, NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey has adopted the use of satellite navigation systems in land surveying. These satellite navigation systems, known as Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), continuously broadcast signals containing information about their position and precise time. Early calculations to calculate a position from satellites (e.g., Global Positioning Systems) used Trilateration calculation. Since then, land surveyors are able to use commercial receivers hardware that collect GNSS signals and are able to determine the receiver’s position in space (e.g., latitude, longitude, and height). Today, NOAA manages a Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) and provides the public free access to the high-accuracy National Spatial Reference System (NSRS) coordinates using an Online Positioning User Service (OPUS). Empirical tests using the OPUS service shows the accuracies of 24-hr GNSS data observations from the CORS network are as follows:
It is important to note that it is possible to reduce these errors further by processing multiple daily static files and doing network adjustments. For CORS time series longer than 2.5 years, we estimate measuring velocities to 0.6 mm/year horizontally and 1.2 mm/year vertically at 95% confidence.
The benefit of redundant observations with good metadata associated with the observations allows the end user to improve climate-scale calculations (e.g., trends) by increasing the number of measurements for determining the position and reducing the random survey errors distributed back into the measurements themselves. This type of calculation in geodesy is defined as a network adjustment. There are different mathematical approaches for network adjustment, where a least square adjustment is the most common mathematical approach used today in geodesy.
Once all available legacy data is properly documented with proper metadata and an uncertainty is associated with each observation; using the 200 years of NGS observations, it is possible to supplement modern-day observations and generate time series that can indicate deformation function and relate it with earth system observation that are associated with:
In addition to monitoring climate scale changes through position observation using known benchmarks, NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey is also monitoring shoreline changes through the Coastal Mapping Program and height changes of the geoid using deflection of vertical evaluation:
Shoreline monitoring — Using NOAA and commercial georeferenced satellite/aerial imagery, it is possible to identify changes to the coastal characteristics. The main use for shoreline monitoring is for updating NOAA Electronic Navigation Charts (ENCs), especially along port areas. Shoreline changes can also be used to visualize water-level trends over years and decades and quantify the potential impacts on the coastal communities and coastal ecological systems.
Geoid model evaluation — NOAA’s NGS is validating geoid models by performing independent measurements through three field campaigns called “The Geoid Slope Validation Survey (GSVS)” that evaluated the accuracy of geoid as a function of the sloped of the model ("geoid undulations slopes"). These modern day observations overlap traditional leveling observations that were conducted more that 100 years ago. Using these climate-scale geoid observations, NGS established the Geoid Monitoring Service (GeMS) in 2019. This product is actively investigating all potential physical processes that could modify the geoid over time and how to properly incorporate these changes into the national geospatial infrastructure and other civilian and military applications.
Ahlgren, K. 2022. GeMS Validation Survey, NGS Webinar series, May 22, 2022, Silver Spring, MD, USA. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/web/science_edu/webinar_series/gems-validation-survey.shtml
Ahlgren, K., V.Childers, T. Damiani, R. Hardy, J.Kanney, N. Kinsman, J. Krcmaric, D.Roman, D. Smith, D. van Westrum, D. Winester, and M. Youngman. 2019. A Preliminary Investigation of the NGS's Geoid Monitoring Service (GeMS). NOAA Technical Report NOS NGS 69, Silver Spring, MD, USA, pp. 120. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/library/pdfs/NOAA_TR_NOS_NGS_0069.pdf
Dracup, J.F. 1996. Geodetic Surveying 1940 - 1990. NOAA special publication NOS NGS 6, Silver Spring, MD, USA, pp. 17. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/51727
Federal Geodetic Control Committee 1984. Standards and Specifications for Geodetic Control, Rockville, Maryland September, pp. 37. https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/FGCS/tech_pub/1984-stds-specs-geodetic-control-networks.pdf
Pe’eri, S., S. Wdowinski, A. Shtibelman, N. Bechor, Y. Bock, r. Nikolaidis, and M. van Domselaar. 2002. “Current plate motion across the Dead Sea Fault from three years of continuous GPS monitoring,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 42.1-42.4.
Scherneck, H-G. 1991. “A Parameterized Solid Earth Tide Model and Ocean Tide Loading Effects for Global Geodetic Baseline Measurements,” Geophys. J. Int., 106, pp 677– 694.
Schenewerk, M.S., W.H. Dillinger, T.M., vanDam, and O. Francis. 1999. “Ocean-Loading Deformations Derived from GPS Observations”, AGU Meeting, June 2.
Scherneck, H.G., and F.H. Webb. 1999. “Ocean tide loading and diurnal tidal motion of the solid Earth centre.” In: IERS Analysis Campaign to Investigate Motions of the Geocentre”. Ray, JR. (ed.), IERS Technical Note 25, Observatoire de Paris, France, pp. 83–89.
Scherneck, H.G., J.M. Johansson, and F.H. Webb. 2000. “Ocean loading tides in GPS and rapid variations of the frame origin”. In: Schwarz KP (eds) Geodesy beyond 2000—The challenges of the first decade, IAG General Assembly. Springer, New York, pp 32–40
Schenewerk, M.S., J. Marshall, and W. Dillinger. 2001. “Vertical ocean loading deformations derived from a global GPS network,” J. Geod. Soc. Jpn., 47(1), 237–242. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sokuchi1954/47/1/47_1_237/_article
Smith, C.L. 2011.Bench Mark Reset Procedures: Guidelines to preserve elevation data for a soon-to-be disturbed or soon-to-be destroyed bench mark. NOAA publication NOS NGS, Silver Spring, MD, USA. 26 pp. https://geodesy.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/Benchmark_4_1_2011.pdf